Congress passed the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) health benefit provisions in 1986. The law was enacted to allow continuity of health insurance coverage for qualified employees and their dependents if they lost coverage due to events like termination, resignation, reduction in work hours, divorce or death. Through COBRA, employees and their dependents have the right to continue coverage under a former employer’s group health plan for up to 18 months (36 months in the case of death, divorce or Medicare entitlement of the former employee), so long as the employee pays the total cost for the coverage and up to a 2% administrative fee.
COBRA Administrative Mistakes Costly for Employers
While COBRA has worked well for employees, it has always presented employers with a number of difficulties. Maintaining detailed records, notifying eligible beneficiaries and collecting premium payments make administration complicated and time-consuming. Employers make mistakes and this can result in large fines, including:
- IRS excise taxes of $100 to $200 daily for each notice, up to 10% of the cost of the health plan or $500,000 per year.
- Department of Labor fines of $110 daily for each notice.
In addition, an employer or plan administrator may have to pay medical expenses and litigation costs if a case goes to court.
Outsourcing COBRA Administration May Be a Solution
The compliance issues and the cost involved in maintaining COBRA plans have led many companies to outsource this function. Some of the benefits of outsourcing include:
• Controlling Costs
HR personnel who are unsure of statutory requirements regarding eligibility will minimize risk exposure by providing COBRA benefits to employees who are not technically eligible. Third-party administrators have the legal expertise to know which employees are truly eligible and which are not, which can mean a substantial savings in claim costs.
• Eliminating the need to train staff in plan administration
Not only do HR staff need initial COBRA administration training, they require ongoing training to keep up with all statutory, regulatory and case law developments.
• More efficient use of HR staff’s time
Utilizing HR personnel for COBRA administration lessens their ability to make a more positive impact on the company’s overall operation, like recruiting good employees or arbitrating disputes between department managers and their staff.
• Equitable treatment for all qualified beneficiaries
Third party administrators aren’t swayed by emotion or subject to potential conflicts of interest when they determine eligibility. They base their decisions exclusively on the statutory and regulatory requirements, which ensures fair treatment for all qualified beneficiaries.
Contact Us
© Copyright 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and the Kinesis logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.
Disclaimer of Liability
Our firm provides the information in this e-newsletter for general guidance only and does not constitute the provision of legal advice, tax advice, accounting services, investment advice, or professional consulting of any kind. The information provided herein should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional tax, accounting, legal, or other competent advisers. Before making any decision or taking any action, you should consult a professional adviser who has been provided with all pertinent facts relevant to your particular situation. Tax articles in this e-newsletter are not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding accuracy-related penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. The information is provided “as is,” with no assurance or guarantee of completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose.
Blog
Nonprofit Insights